Designing Safety into Medical Decisions and Clinical Processes
نویسنده
چکیده
After many years of experimental research software systems to support clinical decisionmaking are now moving into routine clinical practice. Most of the research to date has been on the efficacy of such systems, addressing the question of whether computer systems can significantly improve the quality of doctors' decision-making and patient management processes. The evidence that they can make a major improvement is now clear and interest is beginning to turn to the question of how we can make such systems safe. We outline some example applications and discuss what we can learn in developing safety cases for such applications from the work and experience of the software safety community. Some distinctive challenges also arise in medicine, and some novel safety management techniques to address them are being developed.
منابع مشابه
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
Embedding health technology assessment (HTA) in a fair process has great potential to capture societal values relevant to public reimbursement decisions on health technologies. However, the development of such processes for priority setting has largely been theoretical. In this paper, we provide further practical lead ways on how these processes can be implemented. We first present the misconce...
متن کاملIncorporating Cost-Effectiveness Data in a Fair Process for Priority Setting Efforts; Comment on “Use of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden”
Cost-effectiveness data is useful for use in priority setting decisions in order to improve the efficiency of resources used. This paper thereby responds to Eckard et al. which addressed the use of cost-effectiveness data in the actual prioritization decisions in the Swedish national clinical guidelines for heart diseases. Based on a set of experiences on the use of economic evaluation in prior...
متن کاملDon’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to mul...
متن کاملModeling Design Processes and Designer Decisions with Advanced Petri-nets
The in-process decisions made by designers strongly influence both the process of designing and the manifestation of the designed artifact. When improvement of designing is intended, the organization of the process and the content of the designers’ decisions have to be concurrently considered. Due to the inherited complexity, application of a computerbased simulation tool can be an effective so...
متن کاملDesigning and evaluating the effectiveness of a pre-induction checklist on improving the clinical performance of the anesthesia teams in terms of patient safety quality
Background: Exchanging and sharing information within the anesthesia team is very important to maintain patient safety and requires close coordination and cooperation between team members. The aim of this study was to introduce and present a checklist before induction of anesthesia and to evaluate its effect on improving the clinical performance of the anesthesia team and the quality of patient...
متن کامل